avatar_GTX

Gloster Meteor Question

Started by GTX, June 05, 2006, 01:04:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GTX

Hi folks,

I recently came across a reference to the Gloster Meteor being able to carry torpedoes.  This is the first I've heard of this - does anyone know more?  Could this be the start of a folding wing Sea Meteor with torpedoes?

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Radish

Was this the "Beano Book of Jet Aircraft"?

Never heard this idea before, ....was there enough ground clearance under the fuselage, cause wing pylons were definitely a non-starter.

Amazing idea.....hell of a take off!!

I once taught a Space Topic using the Beano as a prime source...I called it "Denis The Menace In Space"...got the photos somewhere of the displays. Very popular it was too. :lol:
Mid says I've grown up a bit now, so I no longer have the weekly edition (sneak one in sometimes though!), but The Bash treet Kids Annual is, of course, a certainty at Christmas. I have to keep some sort of connection with "education" after all. :lol:  
Once you've visited the land of the Loonies, a return is never far away.....

Still His (or Her) Majesty, Queen Caroline of the Midlands, Resident Drag Queen

GTX

#2
Radish,

The reference was actually on a website (can't remember which), so should probably be taken with a handful of salt.  Mind you, there was a possibility of a Naval Meteor:

Following deck handling trials with a Meteor prototype in 1945, two Meteor IIIs were fitted with an arresting hook and reinforced landing gear, and used for carrier trials in 1948. The two aircraft performed takeoffs and landings from the HMS ILLUSTRIOUS and HMS IMPLACABLE. The Royal Navy was impressed by the navalized Meteor, but decided to obtain the Supermarine Attacker instead.





I was thinking maybe folding wings, arrestor hook, appropriate FAA paint scheme ... anything else anyone?

Regards,

Greg

EDIT:  Added pics on carrier.
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

monkeyhanger

I've never heard of a proposal to put torpedoes on a Meteor. The Navy certainly operated some F IIIs which looked very attractive in the RN colours. I have some colour plates of these aircraft......... but the book is in storage along with the rest of my worldly belongings.

Radish

Just one Meteor F.3 used postwar in tests I believe.
The RN had some Meteor T.7s too of course.

An interesting idea, though. :P  
Once you've visited the land of the Loonies, a return is never far away.....

Still His (or Her) Majesty, Queen Caroline of the Midlands, Resident Drag Queen

Maverick

Radish,

The AW NF variants were plumbed for underwing pylons and tanks, admittedly no where near enough for a torp, but then again, centreline could be an option, look at the Beaufighter...

Nigel Bunker

Not a lot of room under a Meteor for a torpedo. Unless you changed the cross section from round to elliptical.
Life's too short to apply all the stencils

jcf

#7
QuoteNot a lot of room under a Meteor for a torpedo. Unless you changed the cross section from round to elliptical.
How about recessed into the belly?

'Twould look cool, but may have had release problems.

Cheers, Jon

NARSES2

Well I'm in the process of building a MK III for the Airfix GB so I tried it last night - in 1/72 scale it's a very tight fit with very little clearance  :wacko:  
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Radish

I like the idea of a semi-recessed torpedo. even though in reality there wouldn't have been room on the real aircraft. This is whatiffery after all, so add fuel tanks under the wings too, or why not add scabbed on tanks to the fuselage, like on the F-15E, or even a humped back, like the MiG-21K??

:D  
Once you've visited the land of the Loonies, a return is never far away.....

Still His (or Her) Majesty, Queen Caroline of the Midlands, Resident Drag Queen

P1127

Dind't the F8 (export model) have the ability to carry bombs?
It's not an effing  jump jet.

Ian the Kiwi Herder

QuoteDind't the F8 (export model) have the ability to carry bombs?
As did the F4.

F8's could 'comfortably' carry sixteen RP's in twin tiers under the wings, also 500 & 1000pounders, but the trade-off on range/endurence would be huge. Remember almost all those first and second generation jets were incredibly fuel hungry.....

Love the idea, though. Hmmmmm thinx, didn't the early Skyraiders carry something like a 'mini' torpedo. There's nothing wrong with doubling the WhIf coefficient by building it in USN colours circa 1950 and then have it carry one of those mini torps !

Ian
"When the Carpet Monster tells you it's full....
....it's time to tidy the workbench"

Confuscious (maybe)

lancer

Quoteand then have it carry one of those mini torps !

I was going to enquire about the possibility of minature torpedos for the navalised Meteor. Although the approach speed of the Meteor would have to be factored in. Personally, I'd go for early anti ship missiles. Take the early German types and use them as a basis to start from.
If you love, love without reservation; If you fight, fight without fear - THAT is the way of the warrior

If you go into battle knowing you will die, then you will live. If you go into battle hoping to live, then you will die

Gary

You know, as a follow up, if you had a long nosed Meatbox from Matchbox, you could also do some fun stuff with depth charges and the like. The small nuke type that were so popular in the 50's. Add a towed mad array off the tail, sonobouys in a ventral drop array just before the tail, a third seat, drop tanks and two depth charges outside the engines.
Ker-splash and ker-boooooooooom!
Getting back into modeling

P1127

I've often wondered about building the NF14 Meteor withour the radar nose - a sort of later T bird, but giving it a combat role - FAC perhaps
It's not an effing  jump jet.