Lenticular Aircraft

Started by KJ_Lesnick, April 25, 2017, 06:42:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

KJ_Lesnick

Suposedly in the 1950's the USAF produced several lenticular shaped aircraft of which one was 40 feet in diameter and several others are of different sizes.
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

Air21

I know that the Pye Wacket program was developing high speed super maneuverable missiles to defend the XB-70 from fighters and missiles and that those were lenticular...

rickshaw

And just think, some 60 years after these super-advanced aircraft were developed, none of them seem to be in general service, Robyn/Kendra.   Funny that, hey?
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

andrewj

Yes , another aviation dead end .

Mossie

Ones I can think of are the Avro series of circular aircraft, developed in partnership with the USAF.  VZ-9 Avro car, Project Y-2, Silverbug, WS606A and WS606B.  I don't anything about a 40ft saucer though.

Detailed brochure on the Silverbug:
http://www.cufon.org/cufon/silverbg.htm
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

KJ_Lesnick

Quote from: rickshaw on April 25, 2017, 07:08:47 PMAnd just think, some 60 years after these super-advanced aircraft were developed, none of them seem to be in general service, Robyn/Kendra.
There are weapons that are used in small specialist roles, but it would appear they never flew at all, or operation
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

rickshaw

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on April 29, 2017, 09:56:44 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on April 25, 2017, 07:08:47 PMAnd just think, some 60 years after these super-advanced aircraft were developed, none of them seem to be in general service, Robyn/Kendra.
There are weapons that are used in small specialist roles, but it would appear they never flew at all, or operation

Which suggests what about their usefulness, Kendra/Robyn?

For your 40ft lenticular aircraft, I'd recommend checking here - Flying Saucers-For Real?    Despite all their supposed technical advantages, it seems they weren't very successful...    :banghead:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

RAFF-35

There was a German aircraft called the Sack AS.6, built in 1937





Don't let ageing get you down, it's too hard to get back up

KJ_Lesnick

Quote from: rickshaw on April 29, 2017, 08:41:54 PMWhich suggests what about their usefulness, Kendra/Robyn?

For your 40ft lenticular aircraft, I'd recommend checking here - Flying Saucers-For Real?    Despite all their supposed technical advantages, it seems they weren't very successful...    :banghead:
Which either means they weren't real or were exaggerated in capability?
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

rickshaw

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on May 05, 2017, 05:34:29 PM
Quote from: rickshaw on April 29, 2017, 08:41:54 PMWhich suggests what about their usefulness, Kendra/Robyn?

For your 40ft lenticular aircraft, I'd recommend checking here - Flying Saucers-For Real?    Despite all their supposed technical advantages, it seems they weren't very successful...    :banghead:
Which either means they weren't real or were exaggerated in capability?

Basically, yes.  I suspect they fly fast and in a straight line well but apart from that? 
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

KJ_Lesnick

#10
Quote from: rickshaw on May 05, 2017, 07:54:27 PMBasically, yes.  I suspect they fly fast and in a straight line well but apart from that?
Would you say they exaggerated their speeds?  I'm not sure what kind of engine we had at that time that could generate such speeds
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

rickshaw

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on May 06, 2017, 09:06:20 PM
Quote from: rickshaw on May 05, 2017, 07:54:27 PMBasically, yes.  I suspect they fly fast and in a straight line well but apart from that?
Would you say they exaggerated their speeds?  I'm not sure what kind of engine we had at that time that could generate such speeds

I thought that was obvious - an anti-gravity one...   ;)
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

jcf

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on May 06, 2017, 09:06:20 PM
Quote from: rickshaw on May 05, 2017, 07:54:27 PMBasically, yes.  I suspect they fly fast and in a straight line well but apart from that?
Would you say they exaggerated their speeds?  I'm not sure what kind of engine we had at that time that could generate such speeds

The frigging things never existed Kendra, so one can pull out of their fundament any damned speed:banghead: