Author Topic: Early British missile fighters  (Read 4418 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MartG

  • Scratchbuilds the entire model
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
    • Martin's Model Accessories
Early British missile fighters
« on: May 29, 2006, 11:46:19 am »
In the months following the 1957 Defence White paper, the British Government was repeatedly embarrassed by Soviet recon aircraft overflying UK territory, with a number of flights actually passing over London. Apart from media pressure regarding Mr Sandys' assertion that missiles would replace fighters, it became plain following the numerous failed attempts by RAF nightfighters to intercept the high flying Soviet recon aircraft that the current interceptor aircraft were inadequate to this task, and many of the programmes recently cancelled were necessary after all. One particular lesson was that vectoring an interceptor into sufficiently close range for a gun attack was practically impossible at the speeds and altitudes involved, especially at night or in bad weather, the conclusion being that guided missiles with a range of several miles would simplify this problem. Given the ongoing embarrassment to the RAF and the UK Government of the overflights, the RAF met with industry representatives, and practically admitted that they would buy virtually anything capable of lifting a radar and toting a missile as long as it could be in service in a matter of months. As can be imagined the RAF was inundated with proposals, but only three were actually translated into serviceable hardware ( the updated Venom proposal from DeHavilland was withdrawn due to their commitment to the Sea Vixen programme ). One was the Saro SR-53A Stinger ( http://www.whatifmodelers.com/forum//index...0043&hl=stinger ) used as a point defence fighter for the capital, while the others were the Gloster Meteor NF.15 ( actually built by Armstrong Whitworth ), and the Hawker Hunter NF.7.

All three were out of service by 1960, being replaced by the Lightning and Javelin. Although seen as a typical British lashup, they served their purpose by getting within missile range of the Soviet aircraft on a number of occasions, the frequency of attempted overflights subsequently falling dramatically as a result ( guess Russian pilots are as averse as anyone to getting warned by their RWR that they have been locked on to by a fighter radar ) though their reliance solely on IR guided missiles limited their usefulness in bad weather.




« Last Edit: May 29, 2006, 11:50:56 am by MartG »
Murphy's 1st Law - An object at rest will be in the wrong place
Murphy's 2nd Law - An object in motion will be going in the wrong direction
Murphy's 3rd Law - For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction


Offline MartG

  • Scratchbuilds the entire model
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
    • Martin's Model Accessories
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2006, 11:46:48 am »
Gloster Meteor NF.15

A modification of the semi-obsolete NF.14, the NF.15 was able to carry a pair of Firestreak missiles. AW did the bare minimum of modifications to allow carriage if the missiles, and performance when armed with the fairly large Firestreak was mediocre at best, even though the original wing mounted cannon were removed to save weight.

Built from the Matchbox kit, needed a lot of filler to get even halfway decent.








 
Murphy's 1st Law - An object at rest will be in the wrong place
Murphy's 2nd Law - An object in motion will be going in the wrong direction
Murphy's 3rd Law - For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction


Offline MartG

  • Scratchbuilds the entire model
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
    • Martin's Model Accessories
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2006, 11:47:31 am »
Hawker Hunter NF.7

Based on the T.66 but with the 200 series Avon from the F.6, Hawker had done some work researching the performance of the then current IR guided missiles and concluded that the 'single shot kill' was a figment of a missile salesman's imagination Consequently the design team decided that being able to ripple fire multiple missiles gave a much greater chance of downing the target. Given the performance limitations of the aircraft, this ruled out the use of the large and heavy Firestreak, Hawker electing to use the Hughes GAR-2 ( later AIM-4B ) Falcon instead with 3 Falcons weighing only 17kg more than a single Firestreak ( or 40kg including triple launcher ). The NF.7 mounted AI.21 radar in the nose and could carry up to twelve  Falcon missiles on the wing pylons, mounted on triple rail launchers, though six was a more usual load. Most F.7s were converted from single seat airframes, which was a relatively simple task due to the modular nature of the Hunter fuselage design. No attempt was made to make the aircraft compatible with the SARH variants of the Falcon, as it was felt that development of this capability would impose an unacceptable delay to the in-service date.

Built from the Matchbox kit, like the Meteor it took a fair bit of filler.









 
Murphy's 1st Law - An object at rest will be in the wrong place
Murphy's 2nd Law - An object in motion will be going in the wrong direction
Murphy's 3rd Law - For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction


Offline lancer

  • Has never been to Hull
  • What-IF SIG
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 10449
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2006, 12:48:21 pm »
Impressive Mart, very impressive. I love the Hunter, although I never realised 92sqn used this varient (only 'cause I've got 'em flying MiG21's n that time frame. :o  :o  :o ). The meteor is also pretty damm good as well. I had the same idea but never got around to building it.
If you love, love without reservation; If you fight, fight without fear - THAT is the way of the warrior

If you go into battle knowing you will die, then you will live. If you go into battle hoping to live, then you will die

Offline Archibald

  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 4984
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2006, 01:02:53 pm »
LOVELY.....!!!!!!!!!!!
King Arthur: Can we come up and have a look?
French Soldier: Of course not. You're English types.
King Arthur: What are you then?
French Soldier: I'm French. Why do you think I have this outrageous accent, you silly king?

Well regardless I would rather take my chance out there on the ocean, that to stay here and die on this poo-hole island spending the rest of my life talking to a gosh darn VOLLEYBALL.

Offline anthonyp

  • aka Captain Obvious
  • Gone but not Forgotten
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • **********
  • Posts: 4725
    • http://hyperion.mystarship.com
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2006, 02:01:39 pm »
I'm diggin' that Falcon armed Hunter! :wub:  :wub:

 :cheers:  :cheers:  
I exist to pi$$ others off!!!
My categorized models directory on my site.
My site (currently with no model links).
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to." - a wise man

Offline GTX

  • Beyond The Sprues Guy
  • What-IF SIG
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 10820
  • "Princess"
    • www.beyondthesprues.com/Forum
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2006, 02:18:10 pm »
Yeah, with 6 (let alone 12 :wacko: ) falcons, that would have had to be one of the most heavily armed beasts of its day.  Were the cannon removed - it kind of looks like there was at least one fitted?

Nice trio.

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Offline Brian da Basher

  • "Klunk" De Basher
  • What-IF SIG
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 8076
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #7 on: May 29, 2006, 02:26:05 pm »
Wow those are sweet! There's something about those RAF colors that makes me sit up and take notice! Excellent builds, Mart!

Brian da Basher

Offline MartG

  • Scratchbuilds the entire model
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
    • Martin's Model Accessories
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #8 on: May 29, 2006, 02:57:56 pm »
Quote
Were the cannon removed - it kind of looks like there was at least one fitted?
Greg - yes, one cannon under stbd nose
Murphy's 1st Law - An object at rest will be in the wrong place
Murphy's 2nd Law - An object in motion will be going in the wrong direction
Murphy's 3rd Law - For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction


Offline NARSES2

  • Nick was always on his mind - just ask the Pet Shop Boys
  • Global Moderator
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 38672
Early British missile fighters
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2006, 12:43:18 am »
Now there's a nice alt RAF night fighter force - love 'em especially the Hunter

Chris
Decals my @r$e!