TinySHAR - LANDED!

[chrisonord]

Brilliant stuff Kit, and hats off to your very famous perseverance 

[Captain Canada]

Defo a tiny little thing ! Turned out great. Nice work !

[Charlie_c67]

See, now I've got to finish mine! Wish I knew where the missing 'winder was 

[scooter]

See, now I've got to finish mine! Wish I knew where the missing 'winder was 

Up the tailpipe of an Argentinian Skyhawk?

[Weaver]

Nice one Kit - I think I'd go mad trying ot do 1/144th fighters.

Silly-looking or not, the inboard pylons were always fitted because they weren't jettisonable, because they were wired for WE.177s. Can't risk scattering the guts of a tac nuke across the innocent voters of the home counties just because you accidentally hit the pylon eject switch...

[zenrat]

Good job Kit.   

Too small for my blood.

[PR19_Kit]

Nice one Kit - I think I'd go mad trying ot do 1/144th fighters.

I nearly did.   

This is the only pic I've found that shows a SHAR with the pylons but without the tanks. It surprised me as I'd figured they'd have fitted the tanks for the QRA task aboard the Atlantic Conveyor,  but seemingly not.



It looks like my 'Royal Navy' script should have been in pale blue or similar, but it wouldn't have shown up if I did. Anyway, that makes the Tiny SHAR a Whiff. 

[NARSES2]

Admire your perseverence Kit 

[frank2056]

Looks good - and unlike the B-2, a handsome reward for your perseverance!

[Weaver]

Nice one Kit - I think I'd go mad trying ot do 1/144th fighters.

I nearly did.   

This is the only pic I've found that shows a SHAR with the pylons but without the tanks. It surprised me as I'd figured they'd have fitted the tanks for the QRA task aboard the Atlantic Conveyor,  but seemingly not.

Pylon without tank is fine, it's the pylon itself that can't be detached. They sometimes carried Sea Eagles on the inboard pylons, but the pylons themselves were never not there.