Convair F-106E

Started by madison, Yesterday at 09:32:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

madison

In the mid-1970s, with the F-15 program suffering serious production delays, the USAF contracted Convair to convert 60 low-hour F-106As to the F-106E configuration as an interim solution until sufficient numbers of F-15s became available.
The F-106E had its internal weapons bay deleted, with the space used for additional fuel, avionics, and an M61A1 Vulcan cannon. The original J75 turbojet was replaced by a Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-100 turbofan, common to the F-15. Although the F100 produced slightly less maximum thrust than the J75, it was considerably lighter, resulting in an improved engine thrust-to-weight ratio.
The avionics and cockpit were extensively updated. A new pulse-Doppler radar compatible with the AIM-7 Sparrow was fitted, while the cockpit received a new ejection seat and a head-up display (HUD). The original retractable infrared seeker ahead of the cockpit was replaced by a fixed infrared search and track (IRST) sensor mounted under the nose.
New underwing pylons allowed the F-106E to carry AIM-7 Sparrow and AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles. Radar warning receivers were also added for self-defense, and an AN/ALQ-100 deception jammer could be carried in an external fairing on the starboard side of the fuselage. To maintain adequate directional stability with the increased external stores, a pair of ventral strakes was added to the rear fuselage.
Conversion of all 60 aircraft was completed within three years, and the F-106Es were assigned to the 33rd TFW at Eglin AFB. They remained in service until 1991, when they were finally retired in the aftermath of the Gulf War.
-------‐----------
Of course, none of this actually happened! 🤣🤣🤣
My what-if F-106E is based on the old Hasegawa 1/72 F-106A kit. It was brush-painted, mostly with Vallejo acrylics. It was a fun project.
Thanks for looking!

madison


sandiego89

Fantastic!  The Six, developed as a pure interceptor, turned out to be a pretty good fighter and surprised more than a few opponents during exercises.

Well done.  Looks great with the pylons and stores. 
Dave "Sandiego89"
Chesapeake, Virginia, USA

Dizzyfugu

Nice. I always wondered how a late F-106 in Hill or air superiority livery would look like. Elegant, I like it!  :thumbsup:

kitbasher

What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105ish/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurri IIc/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spit XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter/Fury F2

PR19_Kit

That works superbly, and the backstory's very plausible too.  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Gondor

Nice, although the 106 could carry the M61 by the end of its career anyway.
My Ability to Imagine is only exceeded by my Imagined Abilities

Gondor's Modelling Rule Number Three: Everything will fit perfectly untill you apply glue...

I know it's in a book I have around here somewhere....

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Gondor on Today at 01:50:53 AMNice, although the 106 could carry the M61 by the end of its career anyway.


But at the expense of its Falcons and without Sparrows or 'winders. Madison's E version's a distinct upgrade.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

zenrat

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.  Revelling in numptyism.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed, badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere, for your convenience.

NARSES2

She really suits that camouflage scheme  :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.