Author Topic: Soviet Carrier Destroyer based on Sovremenny  (Read 1701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Captain Canada

  • "but this time it's different. I was drunk when I agreed to it."
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 30108
Re: Soviet Carrier Destroyer based on Sovremenny
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2020, 04:30:33 pm »
Looks so sinister in those pics ! Like a ghost ship. Great stuff
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

Online Old Wombat

  • Moderator
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 10625
  • Armour: The Gods of War love it!
Re: Soviet Carrier Destroyer based on Sovremenny
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2020, 01:43:39 am »
If I remember correctly, P'Bucket has a limit on views, amongst other things, which means if too many people look at an image it gets blocked for a certain period of time.
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

Offline zenrat

  • Moderator
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 21597
  • Currently on double secret probation.
Re: Soviet Carrier Destroyer based on Sovremenny
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2020, 04:24:24 am »
How very considerate of them.
Do the powers that be at Boto Phucket deliberately look for ways to irritate users?
What a bunch of, well you know, insert your own expletive.  I'm glad I ditched them.
I'd advise anyone still using them to do the same.

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Offline PR19_Kit

  • Closeted Take That fan
  • What-IF SIG
  • Needs A Life Outside What-If
  • *****
  • Posts: 38598
  • Whiffing since the 70s
Re: Soviet Carrier Destroyer based on Sovremenny
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2020, 05:12:13 am »

How very considerate of them.
Do the powers that be at Boto Phucket deliberately look for ways to irritate users?
What a bunch of, well you know, insert your own expletive.  I'm glad I ditched them.
I'd advise anyone still using them to do the same.


1000% agreement there.

What do they hope to achieve with such a stupid ruling?  :banghead: :banghead:
Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit