avatar_Tophe

Twin-Whirlwind & Catalina…

Started by Tophe, December 25, 2004, 02:49:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Captain Canada

hehehe...good one !

I was just thinking, tho, maybe the main gear legs are in those nacelles, that would solve the problem !

:D  
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

Tophe

Other dream:
Maybe you know the USAF competition that led to the triplex pusher XP-54/55/56 (twin-boom/canard/tailless, Vultee/Curtiss/Northrop). The twin-boomer was declared winner (of course!), and I imagine the other companies shouting: "Hey! we can do twin-boomers as well! Let this stupid Vultee company manufacture the booms and use my much better basis!". This created the XP-55/56 MT ("Me Too!")... :)  
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

And a test-bed for the Me 163 dangerous rocket power: 2 Bf 109 at wing-tips for take off...
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

QuoteAnd a test-bed for the Me 163 dangerous rocket power: 2 Bf 109 at wing-tips for take off...
And for Ollie and Matrixone who are fans of the Focke-Wulf family: the test bed of the dangerous  :(  :blink: turbojet power, mixing Fw 190 for take off and Ta 183 project... :wacko:  
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

(all that came from Captain Canada jokes about external engine weights, thanks! - or "condemn him, not me, your Honor"...)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

#35
seen in the latest Model Graphix : Ta283Z and Ho 229Z !
http://modelbox.free.fr/pix/zwiling.JPG

(from dear JCC)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

#36
also:

(a twin flying-wing is a Zwilling twin-plane, twin-pod, not twin-tail-boom though, as there is zero tail, not two... :) )
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Quotehehehe...!
As Captain Todd laughed loudly about the great F4U-44, General Canada has alas  :(  refused to invest those few billion dollars for the 44,000 copies that would have provided safety to his homeland :) .
Well, the Voughtoff artists has been fired out :(  and the wise Voughterleau team  :)  has taken control of the drawing board. The result is the new ,Radish 4-engined Corsair' F4U-44PP (push-pull) below. :)  <_<
If Canada still refuse it, maybe France would accept, with a different name (Voughterleau would be pronounced by the French as they pronounce Waterloo, and French teachers pretend this is a name of infamy and not a great victory...). I guess President Chirac wanting to be elected again may sign the order, requiring just to celebrate the designer (with a name slightly improved) with big flashing letters on the wing: ,,Voughtchirac!". Taxpayers will be happy...
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Captain Canada

Looking good Tophe !

" Voughterleau. promised I'd love you for evermore.....Voughterleau......"
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

Tophe

#39
QuoteVoughterleau Waterloo, and French teachers pretend this is a name of infamy and not a great victory
As the opposite of Waterloo is Austerlitz, that remind the Stieglitz Fw 44 plane, so Focke-Wulf, thus a Fw-190Z/4m Zwilling push-pull equivalent to the F4U-44PP...
To be original, the central pod holds a giant tank for very long range. :wacko:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

QuoteHow about a 4 engined Corsair....probably very wide though, but impressive.
And what-if the P-82 was a 4-engined? Well, my last book included such freaks (the coupled-engine twin-fuselage and the push-pull triplex-fuselage) but what-if a P-82 had 4 fuselages? :blink:  :wacko:
Many possibilities there: Twin-Twin-Mustang (from a Belgian cartoon Tintin-Mustang? P-82TT), with one lateral observer and one almost central pilot...
And an improved version with better view forward, and a little Asymetry (P-82As means Asymetric, no relation to donkey-hole :angry: ). :)  
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Sorry, let us be serious: warbirds are not toys. Here is the what-if Jet-Twin-Mustang/Condor of our Libelula friend, with a whole background story. In service 1946, it could have been designed in 1945.
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

#42
Quotehere is the General Motors Super-Twin-Corsair F2G-11
Why 2 fuselages? That is a way to have a free nose for a huge radar (without pusher propeller endangering bailing out)... this is the asymmetric F2G-11R single engine below. And the second cockpit is for the electronic operator - he has a wind-screen mainly to try piloting to land if the pilot is killed in action. :wacko:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

#43
QuoteAnd the second cockpit is for the electronic operator
No need... A single-seat single-engine Corsair, simply, almost normal... F2G-12 with a big radar - and huge tanks feeding a single engine, the very best for extra long range.  
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

Quotethe fuselage on the Catalina's are a lot closer than I imagined they would be I wonder what a four engined version would look like
Uh? It seems Aircav's 4-engined Twin-Catalina actually exists, and is famous, attracting Twin-brothers and their Twin-wives... :D  
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]