What if

Picture Post => Current and Finished Projects => Aircraft => Topic started by: andrewj on December 08, 2012, 01:43:37 AM

Title: Supermarine 510
Post by: andrewj on December 08, 2012, 01:43:37 AM
Not really a What-if perhaps ,as this one actually existed and flew, but, here's my 1/48 Supermarine type 510. The basis was a Magna Attacker I picked up part started for a tenner, at Cosford earlier this year. Wings and tail surfaces are scratch built, markings from the spares box.

(https://www.whatifmodellers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi719.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww193%2Fandrewj_615%2Fsupermarines006.jpg&hash=9a0061da12c823305cc72b99ad04633d4c943158)
(https://www.whatifmodellers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi719.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww193%2Fandrewj_615%2Fsupermarines003.jpg&hash=f41825f3a51ddf2cdcd2e1566907d1f34cd11285)

Andrew
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: NARSES2 on December 08, 2012, 02:20:06 AM
Nice one Andrew
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: PR19_Kit on December 08, 2012, 02:25:24 AM
Excellent stufff there.  :thumbsup: :bow:

And all that from a Magna kit too!

The mind STILL boggles at the thought oif a tail-wheel jet, even more so at a swept wing one!  :o
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: perttime on December 08, 2012, 03:07:05 AM
Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 08, 2012, 02:25:24 AM
The mind STILL boggles at the thought oif a tail-wheel jet...
In "real life", designers quite early found reasons to go for trike gear: much easier on ground structures, and (in case of the Yak-15 at least) some parts of the airframe itself   :lol:
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: PR19_Kit on December 08, 2012, 08:32:10 AM
I lived for a couple of years at RAF Benson which housed the 'Weekend Warriors' of the RNVR's Southern Air Division.

One of their Squadrons, 1835 NAS, flew Sea Hawks and their co-located unit, 1832 NAS, flew tail-wheeled Attackers. While the 1835 NAS pilots revelled in their faster and better handling aircraft, the 1832 pilots would say that '....proper pilots flew tail wheeled jets!'  ;D
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: kitnut617 on December 08, 2012, 04:10:40 PM
Nicely done Andrew --  :thumbsup:

I was reading in the Morgan & Shacklady book that the Supermarine 391 design lead to the Attacker with it fuselage and tail design, which in turn led to this one.  I can't quite see the relationship myself but there you go.
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: The Wooksta! on December 08, 2012, 04:41:18 PM
Very tasty.

I may have to do one at some point from an Attacker and a Sabre. Obviously it would have to wear in service markings, perhaps the flying greyhound with one of the RNVR squadrons, although I was tempted to add that to a Sea Hawk (I found a Novo one in a box, albeit missing tailplanes).

On reflection, perhaps I could play about with the wing of a Swift?  I've one I'd started hacking about and it may have to end up as conversion fodder.
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: Daryl J. on December 09, 2012, 10:30:03 AM
Lovely!
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: van883 on December 15, 2012, 10:12:57 AM
Very nice-I got my Whirlykits one off the shelf today. And then put it back...
:bow:
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: Glenn Gilbertson on December 15, 2012, 03:43:55 PM
Great bit of work!  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Supermarine 510
Post by: The Wooksta! on December 15, 2012, 03:56:42 PM
Quote from: van883 on December 15, 2012, 10:12:57 AM
Very nice-I got my Whirlykits one off the shelf today. And then put it back...
:bow:

To be fair, some of the early Maintrack Project X vacforms were pretty basic and I think the 510 was one of them.  Then Gordon Stevens of Rareplanes got involved.  The Saro SR177 and Hawker P.1121 were two of his.