What if

Picture Post => Plane Spotting => Topic started by: Sentinel Chicken on June 20, 2012, 08:36:01 AM

Title: Barksdale Hog in HDR
Post by: Sentinel Chicken on June 20, 2012, 08:36:01 AM
Another set of shots from this past weekend's Denton Air Show and one of my favorite aircraft, the Warthog.

(https://www.whatifmodellers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.airlinebuzz.com%2Fchickenworks%2FBuzz%2FDTO_120616_Hog_01.jpg&hash=8b38534dd6e7ceff898d38b49e523a06f8c6bfa1)

(https://www.whatifmodellers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.airlinebuzz.com%2Fchickenworks%2FBuzz%2FDTO_120616_Hog_02.jpg&hash=2fd5d80e000f110c1fbed1a7a43ef0d044f85126)

(https://www.whatifmodellers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.airlinebuzz.com%2Fchickenworks%2FBuzz%2FDTO_120616_Hog_03.jpg&hash=4347f3fb2209632966ee81f286e03fe195ee85c2)

(https://www.whatifmodellers.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.airlinebuzz.com%2Fchickenworks%2FBuzz%2FDTO_120616_Hog_04.jpg&hash=a80a8018bdb221f9b2fb23314415866dd0f530f8)

Didn't realize there was some realignment with Barksdale AFB's reserve Hog unit. Used to part of the 917th Wing which included both the AFRC's Buffs and the A-10s, they were administratively separated and the A-10s are now the 917th Fighter Group and report to the 442nd Fighter Wing which is the A-10 unit based at Whiteman AFB in Missouri as a "geographically separated unit".

I think this is one of the new upgraded A-10Cs. Those aircraft have the new wing set as well as a SATCOM aerial and GPS fairing on the dorsal fuselage (just above the fighter group badge).
Title: Re: Barksdale Hog in HDR
Post by: PR19_Kit on June 20, 2012, 11:30:59 AM
The mind boggles at a unit that consists of A-10s and B-52s........  :o

Shouldn't they have a few T-6s in the mix as well?  ;D

Or an SR-71?
Title: Re: Barksdale Hog in HDR
Post by: scooter on June 20, 2012, 12:02:50 PM
Quote from: PR19_Kit on June 20, 2012, 11:30:59 AM
The mind boggles at a unit that consists of A-10s and B-52s........  :o

Shouldn't they have a few T-6s in the mix as well?  ;D

Or an SR-71?

They both do the same job, Kit-Close Air Support. Just one carpet bombs the bejeezus out of an area, while the other is more...surgical in its application.  ;D
Title: Re: Barksdale Hog in HDR
Post by: pyro-manic on June 20, 2012, 12:14:57 PM
I'd hardly call "hosing the place down with 30mm uranium slugs" surgical. ;D
Title: Re: Barksdale Hog in HDR
Post by: Gondor on June 20, 2012, 03:04:52 PM
Quote from: pyro-manic on June 20, 2012, 12:14:57 PM
I'd hardly call "hosing the place down with 30mm uranium slugs" surgical. ;D

Compared to a B-52 load of two thousand pounders an A-10 is surgical even with said 30mm slugs.

Gondor
Title: Re: Barksdale Hog in HDR
Post by: Hobbes on June 22, 2012, 07:30:21 AM
The mind boggles at A-10s being in a Fighter wing  ;D
Title: Re: Barksdale Hog in HDR
Post by: kerick on July 15, 2012, 12:16:33 PM
The US Air Force simply refuses to use the words attack or strike no matter how much it may apply. Just think of all the "F"-105s and "F"-111s that were obviously not fighters. Closest they ever got was calling a unit a fighter bomber wing.