What if

General Modelling Forum => General Modeling topics => The "WHIF's You Have Found" => Topic started by: kitbasher on July 14, 2009, 02:15:55 PM

Title: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: kitbasher on July 14, 2009, 02:15:55 PM
Try this one for size!
http://www.airlinebuzz.com/forums/blog.php?tag=royal+flight&u=39
And check the author - has it already appeared on this forum?
;D ;D
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: Captain Canada on July 14, 2009, 06:45:36 PM
Very nice. But if it's built in Belfast, there might be a little bit of sabo going on !

:thumbsup:
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: nev on July 15, 2009, 01:03:17 AM
JP Santiago is our very own Sentinel Chicken
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: Weaver on July 15, 2009, 01:04:56 AM
SACRILEDGE!!!!!!


Weaver
@BAe Woodford  ;D
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: The Rat on July 15, 2009, 04:22:20 AM
C'mon Hobbycraft, box a Q400, I want to knock one of those together!  :thumbsup: :cheers:
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: AeroplaneDriver on July 15, 2009, 02:03:39 PM
Quote from: The Rat on July 15, 2009, 04:22:20 AM
C'mon Hobbycraft, box a Q400, I want to knock one of those together!  :thumbsup: :cheers:

NO! NO! NO!  A THOUSAND TIMES NO!

Do NOT let Hobbycraft anywhere near the Q400!  Their -100 is an abomination.  Revell are the ones who need to bring it to us in all its 1/72 scale glory.
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: lancer on July 16, 2009, 08:40:23 AM
Quote from: Weaver on July 15, 2009, 01:04:56 AM
SACRILEDGE!!!!!!


Weaver
@BAe Woodford  ;D

Now, now - Dom't hold back. Show us your true feelings.... :thumbsup:
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: anthonyp on July 23, 2009, 07:03:48 PM
Quote from: Weaver on July 15, 2009, 01:04:56 AM
Weaver
@BAe Woodford  ;D

BAE, BAE, BAE!!!!!   All caps  :ph34r:  (I wouldn't be a disgruntled company man if I didn't point that our everytime I see it)
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: lancer on July 25, 2009, 01:26:22 PM
Quote from: anthonyp on July 23, 2009, 07:03:48 PM
Quote from: Weaver on July 15, 2009, 01:04:56 AM
Weaver
@BAe Woodford  ;D

BAE, BAE, BAE!!!!!   All caps  :ph34r:  (I wouldn't be a disgruntled company man if I didn't point that our everytime I see it)

True, it is all capitals now , but it used to have a small 'e' when it was British Aerospace europe. Before it went all turncoat on it's own country and 're-branded itself to get the US market!!!
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: B777LR on August 04, 2009, 12:57:46 PM
Quote from: anthonyp on July 23, 2009, 07:03:48 PM
Quote from: Weaver on July 15, 2009, 01:04:56 AM
Weaver
@BAe Woodford  ;D

BAE, BAE, BAE!!!!!   All caps  :ph34r:  (I wouldn't be a disgruntled company man if I didn't point that our everytime I see it)

Actually, the word "bae" in Danish means "poop" or "crap" :wacko:
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: lancer on August 05, 2009, 09:14:48 AM
Quote from: B787 on August 04, 2009, 12:57:46 PM
Quote from: anthonyp on July 23, 2009, 07:03:48 PM
Quote from: Weaver on July 15, 2009, 01:04:56 AM
Weaver
@BAe Woodford  ;D

BAE, BAE, BAE!!!!!   All caps  :ph34r:  (I wouldn't be a disgruntled company man if I didn't point that our everytime I see it)

Actually, the word "bae" in Danish means "poop" or "crap" :wacko:




And exactly where does this informational gem fit in with the current thread????
Title: Re: RAF BAe146 Replacement
Post by: B777LR on August 06, 2009, 01:58:24 AM
I like how the horizontal lines make the Q-400 look even longer than normal. A stretch perhaps? Go along the Dornier path and fit a pair of turbofans...

Quote from: lancer on August 05, 2009, 09:14:48 AM
Quote from: B787 on August 04, 2009, 12:57:46 PM
Quote from: anthonyp on July 23, 2009, 07:03:48 PM
Quote from: Weaver on July 15, 2009, 01:04:56 AM
Weaver
@BAe Woodford  ;D

BAE, BAE, BAE!!!!!   All caps  :ph34r:  (I wouldn't be a disgruntled company man if I didn't point that our everytime I see it)

Actually, the word "bae" in Danish means "poop" or "crap" :wacko:




And exactly where does this informational gem fit in with the current thread????

Sorry, the discussion went a bit off topic ;D