Started by GTX, September 06, 2008, 02:41:02 PM
Quote from: sequoiaranger on September 14, 2008, 10:24:15 AMWOW GTX, that REALLY looks cool! It looks like a Bf-109"T" wing (with wing-tip extensions), or even the 109H wing, would go along nicely with the extended fuselage. And the Me-209 V5 tall tail would look good, too! Though I like the looks of the "262" canopy, I think, model-wise, that the 262 canopy is way too wide for the narrow Bf-109 fuselage
QuoteAs we know, the Messerschmitt works tried all kinds of follow-ons to the Bf-109, including various 209 and 309 variants, and really couldn't come up with anything better. I really like the LOOKS of your contra-prop 109, but I think the basic Bf-109 had reached the end of its practical evolution.
Quote from: Sauragnmon on September 18, 2008, 03:06:26 PMI find myself wondering if that 109TL would actually be properly balanced on that tricycle nosegear. I could think a taildragger would still be better for the fuselage, the wing gears are way too forward compared to the rest of the whole aircraft. Not only that, but with a taildragger you could accomodate a whole lot more firepower/ammo in that nice empty nose. Couple 13mm MG's or 15mm cannons to line up the shots, and a couple of the good old Pneumatic Hammers to deliver the heavy hitting.
Page created in 0.027 seconds with 19 queries.