Lockheed P-81A Twin Lightning

Started by b29r, June 27, 2017, 01:59:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

b29r

Lockheed P-81A

As war in the Pacific ground to a halt in mid-1945, it was decided to escalate the air campaign against Japan. B-32's now joined the B-29's engaged in strategic bombardment, but a better solution to long range escort was needed. The advantages of multi-engine fighters like the P-38 had always been apparent, and Lockheed designers decided to take the Lightning to it's next level.

In addition to the escort role, the Twin Lightning could also perform recce missions, and even undertake level bombing raids. She achieved her greatest success, however, in defending the heavy bomber groups. Surprisingly nimble for her size, her twin armament meant that only a few seconds on target was decisive.















This of course is the old Monogram P-38 X 2 with a little surgery. A tried and true old classic, we all know it's faults, but it's still kind of lovable. Thanks for looking, and
Best regards,
Kem


     

 

PR19_Kit

Very good, competition for the Tri-Stang even.  ;D :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

AXU


TheChronicOne

 :bow: :drink: :cheers: :party:


Yeah buddy!!  That's absolutely brilliant work! 


"In flight" as well.... took me a solid couple minutes before I realized there were no props but it's so well done it doesn't stick out because it look right.  :lol:  I guess because the spinners are "solid" all over with no gaps where the props would protrude... like... they're SPINNING so you wouldn't see it at all..   Neato!!  I'm impressed. 
-Sprues McDuck-

zenrat

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Old Wombat

Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Snowtrooper

It's even future-proofed as it has the radar pod underneath the starboard cockpit. The extra range would have been very welcome in the newly established ADC against the "Bull scare". :thumbsup:

b29r

Thanks!  It was a fun and easy build, once the mission was decided on  ;)  I appreciate your support. 

Kit . . . . . not sure what a Tri-Stang is, but it sounds pretty cool!

Best regards and good luck with your builds,
Kem

PR19_Kit

Quote from: b29r on June 30, 2017, 07:07:21 AM

Kit . . . . . not sure what a Tri-Stang is, but it sounds pretty cool!


The North American YP-82L Tri-Stang, as seen in this thread. The build goes on for EVER, but the finished job's pics start at page 11.  ;D ;)

http://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php/topic,37049.0.html



You can see the similarity quite clearly.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Tophe

Nice Twin-Lightning! :thumbsup:
I think this is the third that I see. Years ago I drew this:

with legend: "Jahsan Pair of 38's, Brooks P-38Z & Drone, Petrie P-38T"
PS. My collection of P-38, big, is at http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/#Sit
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

b29r

Kit . . . . I bow to you Sir!  That is the neatest conversion ever!  I will confess that I didn't read every single comment, but I did follow the progress of the build and am totally gobsmacked :o

I like how you addressed the contraprop application for the center engine, I couldn't figure a neat (and cheap) way to accomplish this.  I just love it  :wub:, thank you for mentioning it or I would have completely missed it.  Now where did I put that F-82 kit????? :wacko:

Tophe:  I did miss seeing your cool drawings on this, but I did shamelessly copy Mark Jahsan's fine build from a few  <_< years back.  Thanks for your kind remarks about mine, I appreciate it!

PR19_Kit

Quote from: b29r on June 30, 2017, 10:28:33 AM

Kit . . . . I bow to you Sir!  That is the neatest conversion ever!  I will confess that I didn't read every single comment, but I did follow the progress of the build and am totally gobsmacked :o

I like how you addressed the contraprop application for the center engine, I couldn't figure a neat (and cheap) way to accomplish this.  I just love it  :wub:, thank you for mentioning it or I would have completely missed it.  Now where did I put that F-82 kit????? :wacko:


My pleasure, glad you like it.  ;D

The contraprop for the centre fuselage seemed a must to me, as NA had gone to the trouble to minimise torque reaction by handing the P-82's engines. Of course I had the extra props as I needed at least two P-82 kits for the build, and sandwiching them together offered a sensible solution. The prop build went fine, but painting it was a nightmare!  :banghead:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Tophe

Quote from: b29r on June 30, 2017, 10:28:33 AM
Tophe:  I did miss seeing your cool drawings on this, but I did shamelessly copy Mark Jahsan's fine build from a few  <_< years back.  Thanks for your kind remarks about mine, I appreciate it!
Dear B29R, this is not only copy but creation: today you made me dream of further Twin-Lightnings, thanks! :thumbsup: ;D
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]