S

U.S. H-Type Piston Engines

Started by sideshowbob9, July 31, 2010, 03:29:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

sideshowbob9

I was reading a book on American fighters last night and turned up something interesting under the Lockheed XP-58 entry. Among the many engines considered for the Chain Lightning was the Continental H-2860. Now I have never heard of this but even my maths-poor brain worked out it was 2 IV-1430s in a H configuration. Does anyone else have any information on this engine?

While we are on the subject can anyone point me in the direction of some references on the other H-type engines, the P & W H-2600, Lycoming H-2470 and the Menasco H-4070?

Slightly off topic, does anyone know what the Engineering Division W-2779 is? Best I can come up with is that someone coupled 2 V-1400s.

Jschmus

Pratt & Whitney X-1800, aka XH-2600
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_X-1800

This one is not an H-type engine, but it's derived from Lycoming's work on the H-2470
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoming_R-7755

Thus far I haven't found anything on the other engines, but I will keep searching.
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."-Alan Moore

apophenia

ssb9: For a history of the P&W liquid-cooled engines (R-2060, H-3730, etc.) see:
http://www.enginehistory.org/Convention/2006/Presentations/McCutcheonK/PWLC3_1.pdf

In a nutshell, George Mead visited the UK in 1937 and was inspired by Napier to design the X-1800 (XH-2240) which led to the XH-2600 and ultimately the XH-3730 (X-3130/H-3130).

BTW, that 3130 refers to the displacement for the engine P&W proposed to the USN. Originally the proposal was for an air-cooled poppet-valved X-24 engine, hence X-3130. This was first changed to liquid-cooling, then to an H-24 configuration (2,650 hp inspired by the USAAC's X-1800 Hyper engine). Displacement was then increased to 3730 cid (hence the military's XH-3730 designation while P&W retained their now-inaccurate H-3130 designation).

For further searches, also try the know MX- designations. See: Andreas Parsch's MX- listing
http://www.designation-systems.net/usmilav/mx/1-499.html

There's a few details out there on the big Continental and Lycoming engines. I've yet to find any real details on the Menascos.

Anyway, here's my listing of US H engines (with inverted Vs added for good measure).  ;D
_____________________________

US H-/XH- Engines

Continental XH-2860-1, 2851 cid, 5,000 hp H-24 (twinned O-1430 opposed-12)

Lycoming XH-2470 (MX-211) 2,468 cid (5.24' x 4.75'), 2,200-2,300 hp (XF14C, XP-54)
- twinned 1,275 hp, 1,234 cid O-1230 Hyper opposed-12

Menasco XH-4070-1 (MX-110) 4,071 cid (6' x 6') 3,400 hp, not built

Pratt & Whitney XH-2240 (X-1800) Hyper 2,240 cid, sleeve-valve H, enlarged into XH-2600
Pratt & Whitney XH-2600 (X-1800) Hyper 2,598 cid, sleeve-valve H, 2,000-2,200 hp, 1 built
Pratt & Whitney XH-3730 (X-3130 or H-3130*) Hyper, sleeve-valve H, 3,000 hp

Studebaker XH-9350 (MX-232) 9349 cid (8' x 7.75'), 5,000 hp H-24, not built

Wright XH-4240, 4243 cid (6.125' x 6'), 2,000 hp H-24 (using XIV-2020 cylinders), not built
_________________________________

US I-/IV-/XIV- Inverted V Engines

Chrysler I-2220, 2,219 cid (5.8' x 5.25') V-16, 2,000 hp (2,500 hp projected), for XP-47H
- inverted V-16 (paired V-8s)

Continental XIV-1430, 1425.5 cid (5.5' x 5'), 1,500-1,700 hp V-12, for XP-49/-52/-53/-67
- inverted V-12 derivative of XO-1430/O-1430 opposed-12

Continental IV-1440, (IV-1430 derivative?), for XP-58

Menasco XIV-2020-1 (MX-46), 2035 cid (6' x 6') 2,000 hp, not built

_____________________________________

sideshowbob9

Thanks for the info guys.

QuoteWright XH-4240, 4243 cid (6.125' x 6'), 2,000 hp H-24 (using XIV-2020 cylinders), not built

Never heard of this one before. Are you sure it uses 2 Menasco IV-2020s? If so, how does it have a different volume to the Menasco H-4070 which must definately use IV-2020s? The 4240 number is closer to using 2 IV-2220s but even that doesn't quite add up.

I'm not saying it's wrong but it is something of an oddity.

jcf

Quote from: sideshowbob9 on August 02, 2010, 04:44:45 AM

QuoteWright XH-4240, 4243 cid (6.125' x 6'), 2,000 hp H-24 (using XIV-2020 cylinders), not built

Never heard of this one before. Are you sure it uses 2 Menasco IV-2020s? If so, how does it have a different volume to the Menasco H-4070 which must definately use IV-2020s? The 4240 number is closer to using 2 IV-2220s but even that doesn't quite add up.

I'm not saying it's wrong but it is something of an oddity.

Note that evidently the Wright used the IV-2020 cylinders, not complete engines, and that the cylinder bore was increased to 6.125 in, increasing the swept volume of each cylinder to 176.78 in3.

176.78 X 24 = 4242.79 in3.

"Conspiracy theory's got to be simple.
Sense doesn't come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated crap
actually is than they ever are about
whatever's supposed to be behind the
conspiracy."
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

sideshowbob9

Ah, that will be it then. Thanks.

apophenia

Yeah, thanks Jon. Obviously I could have made the bit about IV-2020 cylinders a tad clearer.

BTW, if anyone has more on those Menascos, I'd love to hear about them.

ysi_maniac

Will die without understanding this world.

KJ_Lesnick

Quote from: apophenia on July 31, 2010, 03:04:26 PMIn a nutshell, George Mead visited the UK in 1937 and was inspired by Napier to design the X-1800 (XH-2240) which led to the XH-2600 and ultimately the XH-3730 (X-3130/H-3130).
I thought the 3130/3730 came first?

QuoteAnyway, here's my listing of US H engines (with inverted Vs added for good measure).  ;D
_____________________________

US H-/XH- Engines

Continental XH-2860-1, 2851 cid, 5,000 hp H-24 (twinned O-1430 opposed-12)
You know, I never knew they doubled up the XI-1430.  When did they propose doubling up this design?
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

jcf

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on June 01, 2019, 04:11:46 PM
You know, I never knew they doubled up the XI-1430.  When did they propose doubling up this design?

They didn't, it was two of the original O-1430 design stacked one above the other.
The O-1430 was redesigned into the inverted V-12 XI-1430.
"Conspiracy theory's got to be simple.
Sense doesn't come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated crap
actually is than they ever are about
whatever's supposed to be behind the
conspiracy."
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

dogsbody

What about the Napier Monarch? The US checked it out with a Fairey Battle borrowed from Britain.






Chris
"What young man could possibly be bored
with a uniform to wear,
a fast aeroplane to fly,
and something to shoot at?"

jcf

That's the Fairey P.24 Monarch.  ;)
"Conspiracy theory's got to be simple.
Sense doesn't come into it. People are
more scared of how complicated crap
actually is than they ever are about
whatever's supposed to be behind the
conspiracy."
-The Peripheral, William Gibson 2014

NARSES2

Is the radiator on that Monarch retractable ? Could be fun taking off/landing on a bumpy field if it isn't.

Decals my @r$e!

PR19_Kit

It's the engine that's a Monarch, the aeroplane is a Battle, or it was once anyway.  ;D

Yes, that's one MONSTER radiator for sure.  :o
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

kitnut617

Looking at the side view of that Battle/Monarch, gave me an idea --- what-if the radiator was modified into a P-51 style radiator duct ---
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike