Started by GTX, May 03, 2009, 12:32:14 PM
Quote from: raafif on May 03, 2009, 05:57:42 PMtut, tut, isn't the Barra ugly enough without sticking a radar belly on it ?
Quote from: PR19_Kit on May 04, 2009, 04:04:50 AMQuote from: raafif on May 03, 2009, 05:57:42 PMtut, tut, isn't the Barra ugly enough without sticking a radar belly on it ? Eh? The Barra doesn't even come CLOSE in the 'World's Ugliest Aircraft' competition. You want Ugly? Try a Blackburn Blackburn, yeuk! Or that diabolocal 'thing' that Boeing made from a 747 to carry bits of 777 about, strewth.......
Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on May 05, 2009, 11:47:01 AM787 parts actually Kit.
Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on May 05, 2009, 11:47:01 AMAnd as I see them fly over the house on a regular basis I have to disagree about their level of ugliness.The Dreamlifter (daft name, I'll give you that) is still a 747 and thus her root prettiness still comes through as she passes overhead.
Quote from: PR19_Kit on May 05, 2009, 04:49:36 PMTo my mind the Beluga, vast though it is, has much more 'style' than the Dreamlifter. The Boeing's fuselage transitions just don't hack it for me. I'm within visual range of Belugas flying into Filton, they look like fast Zeppelins from here......
Quote from: kitnut617 on May 05, 2009, 05:39:42 PMWell I came across this photo, Griffon power egg installation
QuoteEDIT: no I've found another photo of it, it is the prototype of the Mk.V and did have a Griffon.
Page created in 0.033 seconds with 22 queries.