MiG-22 'Flipper' Interceptor - TNI-AU Service

Started by rickshaw, February 09, 2017, 02:08:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rickshaw

MiG-22 Flipper

To fulfil the needs of the PVO (Protivovozdushnaya Oborona – air defence forces) for a heavy interceptor to carry out automatic interceptions, the MiG bureau had developed a range of large fighter aircraft starting with the swept wing I-3 series (a.k.a. I-380, I-410 and I-420), followed by the I-7 and the I-75. The requirement for supersonic interception speed and the ability to carry the heavy avionic systems dictated the size; in comparison the contemporary MiG-21F (similar in layout), weighed 4,819 kg (10,624 lb) and was 15.76m (51 ft 8-1/2in) long, compared with 12,345 kg (27,215 lb) and 18.14m (59 ft 6in) respectively, for the Ye-150.

The MAP (Ministerstvo Aviatsionnoy Promyshlennosti - ministry of aviation industry) ordered the Mikoyan OKB to build prototypes of the new interceptor, to be armed with either K-6, K-7, K-8, K-9, unguided rockets, or an aimable twin cannon installation. Automatic guidance to the interception point was to be provided by Urugan-5 (hurricane-5) integrated weapons systems.

Ye-152A

The Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-152A was a twin-engined version of the Ye-152, sharing its general layout but utilising two Tumansky R-11 afterburning turbojets mounted side by side in a revised rear fuselage. The change in engine type, necessitated by the extremely poor reliability of the R-15, led to a widened rear fuselage with large ventral fins. The majority of the airframe was identical to the Ye-152, incorporating the extended inlet and fuselage found to be advantageous during testing for the proposed Ye-151 cannon armed variant of the Ye-150. Due to the use of fully developed and reliable R-11 engines the Ye-152A was ready for flight in July 1959 and continued to fly on test duties at the Mikoyan-Gurevich test centre until it crashed in 1965.

Armament was to have been two K-9 air-to-air missiles, as part of the Ye-152-9-V weapon system, featuring the TsKB Almaz TsP-1 fire control radar.

The Ye-152A was assigned the NATO reporting name Flipper after a flypast during the 1961 Aviation Day display at Tushino and also erroneously labelled as the MiG-23.

Uragan-5

Development of the Uragan-5 automatic weapon system was initiated by the Council of Ministers in 1955 to intercept supersonic bombers flying at 10-25,000m ( ft) altitude at 1600–2000 km/hour up to 100–120 km range from the interceptor base, (with sufficient warning). The system relied on ground based radar to guide the interceptor to an intercept with the target and aircraft based radar and weapon aiming systems to complete the mission using the following components:

A high resolution ground based radar system, to provide accurate position and height data at a range of 345 km.
Active interrogation system (SAZO)
Automatic guidance facility
Digital control computer
Command data link (SPK)
Interceptor-fighter with Airborne radar (detection range of 25 km minimum), Autopilot, and Weapon-aiming computer (SRP)

Armament options included:

2 x 30mm cannon in a tilting rotatable mount.
Unguided rockets.
2x Grushin K-6 air-to-air missiles
2x Toropov K-7 air-to-air missiles
2x Kaliningrad K-8 (R-8) air-to-air missiles
2x Raduga K-9 air-to-air missiles
A combination of delays in development of the electronic components, missiles and poor reliability of the Tumansky R-15 engines for the aircraft component led to the Uragan-5 system, fitted to Ye-150 derivatives being cancelled in 1962.

Adoption of the Ye-152a

The PVO adopted in limited numbers the Ye-152a as the MiG-22.  As part of the Mastrovoka campaign against Western Intelligence, the aircraft was given a different identification which Western Intelligence Agencies had erroneously given it (MiG-23).   However, the MiG-22 was not a success and was quickly superseded by the Sukhoi Su-15.

This however did not prevent the MiG-22 being sold overseas to client states of the Soviet Union.   Both the Cuban Air Force and the Indonesian Air Force adopted it.  Both felt the need for a fast climbing, heavily armed interceptor which would allow them to protect their island nations.

After the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis when Cuba was heavily dependent on the Soviet Union for it's protection against an impeding American attack and invasion, the MiG-22P (Perekhvatchik "Interceptor") was supplied to the island nation.   Armed initially with K9 "AWL" missile which looked impressive, even if it performed badly, the missile was quickly superseded by the much shorter ranged but more reliable K13 Atoll missile. This actually fitted more closely with the Russian's plans for the Cubans, preferring to keep their aircraft on a "short leash" rather than arming it with the longer-ranged K9s. The K9 missiles were however kept for intelligence purposes and nearly all photos of the MiG-22 in Cuban service show it carrying the larger, less reliable missile.

In 1965, when the Communist Party of Indonesia overthrew the Sukarno Government and instated the Peoples' Democratic Republic of Indonesia (PDRI) under President Untung bin Syamsuri who had lead the Revolution on 30 September 1965.  He replaced President Sukarno soon afterwards.   The Indonesian Air Force, which had already been largely equipped with Soviet aircraft, adopted the MiG-22PFM (Perekhvatchik Forsirovannyy Modernizirovannyy "Interceptor Uprated Modernised"), an improved version, mounting the K8 Air-to-Air missile, in both Infra-Red and Radar homing versions.   This missile was also carried by the Su-15 and Yak-28 Interceptors in Soviet Service.

The MiG-22PFM served with the TNI-AU for the next 10 years before it was replaced by Su-15 Flagon interceptor.

17
18
20
21
22

The Kit

A Modelvisit 1/72 Ye-152a Flipper model.  A most unusual model in that it doesn't have a single locating pin in the entire kit!  It uses ledges and channels to locate everything.   A little difficult to build but quite interesting.  The missiles came from another poster (Chris) and the Decals from Kit.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

JasonW

Looks good. What paint did you use for the silver finish?
It takes only one drink to get me drunk. The trouble is, I can't remember if it's the thirteenth or the fourteenth.

   - George Burns

PR19_Kit

That looks one big 'ole model there Brian! Most impressive.  :thumbsup:

I wondered what you in mind for those Indonesian decals, and that's some of the answer.  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

Quote from: JasonW on February 09, 2017, 06:58:55 AM
Looks good. What paint did you use for the silver finish?

Rattle-can paint out of a spray-tin.  I don't think the brand would make much sense to you, it doesn't to me!  I bought it at the local Bunnings about 2 years ago.   Combines with some Vallejo silver on a few panels to provide a contrast.   :thumbsup:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on February 09, 2017, 08:06:49 AM
That looks one big 'ole model there Brian! Most impressive.  :thumbsup:

I wondered what you in mind for those Indonesian decals, and that's some of the answer.  ;D

It works out about 10 inches long, so about 3 inches longer than a standard MiG-21.  I've loved the MiG-23 since I bought an old ARII 1/144 kit way back in the late 1970s.   As for your decals. they are a bugger to work with - those white backgrounds need careful trimming to make it work properly.  I do have more plans...   ;)
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: rickshaw on February 09, 2017, 04:55:30 PM

As for your decals. they are a bugger to work with - those white backgrounds need careful trimming to make it work properly.  I do have more plans...   ;)


You're dead right, the white decal backing paper needs a lot of care when you trim it. I find it useful to keep the blade at an angle so that the point is under the piece of decal that you're cutting. That way the decal's edge is angled away from view so the white isn't so visible.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on February 09, 2017, 05:06:12 PM
Quote from: rickshaw on February 09, 2017, 04:55:30 PM

As for your decals. they are a bugger to work with - those white backgrounds need careful trimming to make it work properly.  I do have more plans...   ;)


You're dead right, the white decal backing paper needs a lot of care when you trim it. I find it useful to keep the blade at an angle so that the point is under the piece of decal that you're cutting. That way the decal's edge is angled away from view so the white isn't so visible.

I'll bear that in mind for the next time, thanks.   Your decals are much better than the ones supplied with the Resin version of the MiG-23 which I used for the accompanying Cuban Air Force example.   They were red stars printed on white decal paper so you had to cut the stars out very, very carefully.  Much, much, harder even than your TNI-AU ones!  Which is of course why it ended up with Cuban Air Force decals, rather than Soviet stars!   :thumbsup:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

zenrat

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Glenn Gilbertson


DogfighterZen

"Sticks and stones may break some bones but a 3.57's gonna blow your damn head off!!"

Captain Canada

What a great looking build. Always loved the look of that rear-end !

:thumbsup:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

dwomby

My absolute favourite Mig design.   I have built the 1/144 one but now am salivating for this big beast.   Great choice of country and backstory.  The USSR should have built this although, despite all official claims to the contrary, I am convinced this was the basis for the Shenyang F-8 Finback A.

David